Friday, October 1, 2021

APPC Webinar 1 on Resetting Capitalism- Moderator Opening Remarks

 

Moderator Opening Remarks

 



Thank you for the kind introduction.  I was going to write a review on the subject but was spared the effort by my former GlobalSource Partners co-author Maggie Debuque Gonzales. Her thoughtful and comprehensive report titled “Re-thinking shareholder capitalism” was shared with me, and I encourage all to read.



Let me summarize the key points in her paper peppered

w my own musings:



1) there has been recent serious rethinking both in academia and business circles of the Friedman Principle— “the only responsibility of business is to increase profit”.   Initially occasioned by the Global Financial Crisis, and now with the harsh impact of COVID, which revealed some of the weaknesses of the existing capitalist system.  In the business sector, the debate focussed on which market model would deliver long lasting and widespread prosperity— stakeholder capitalism or shareholder capitalism.



2) landmark events that skewed  the discussion towards

 the latter are:


- the August 2019 US Business Roundtable signed by over 180 CEO’s of major corporations released a “statement on the purpose of a corporation” that declared “a fundamental commitment to all stakeholders” and listed specific commitments to customers, employees, suppliers and relevant communities, in addition to long term value for corporate shareholders “. 



- here in the Philippine 20 business organizations signed last November 2020 “ A Covenant for Shared Prosperity” where the country’s business leaders vowed to raise the welfare of all local stakeholders.


- these same organizations and conglomerates,  have also walked the talk in addressing pain points brought about by the pandemic, way way beyond their commercial interests.  These initiatives welcomed by and working hand in hand w govt include  in :  testing facilities ( construction of new laboratories), quarantine facilities, hospital facilities, vaccination procurement, administration and communications.  


These were all done in the Phl Bayanihan spirit of volunteerism,  not because of dictat, but a recognition that corporations do have social responsibilities emanating from their dominant role and command over resources, apart  from individual shareholders initiatives.



3)  The pandemic and talk of a a new normal and a reset have raised the profile of the issue.   Practical question of  how do we translate high level principles to actionable items for  boards and managements ( esp of major publicly listed corporations.)

   

a) how relevant are the limiting conditions to Friedman in a developing country / Phl contexts? 



Hart and Zingales wrote: “Friedman is right only if the profit making and damage generating activities of companies are separable or if governmentperfectly internalizes externalities through laws and regulations” or in case the government does not, if the shareholder population  perfectly internalizes externalities and spend the appropriate amount for mitigation or correction.

 

 

These assumptions are:


- perfect market (no market failure ) assumptions chief among which are 
           

             - no market power (implying no rule making power for firms) 
            - no externalities (absence of markets ) and whether they may or                                    

 

                may not be internalized by shareholder.

 

 


The answer is clearly affirmative. But these assumptions are heroic and generally hold true only for small firms. Thus, they conclude maximization of shareholder welfare should now be Pareto efficient for large firms while the Friedman rule of maximizing shareholder value hold only for

Small firms.

.  
 

b) which brings us to the next question:  how do we  operationalize stakeholder welfare optimization, clearly the relevant situation in a country like the Phl w high concentration of large companies?



- multiple masters and objectives means no guidance to the Board.  (Issue of primacy of  fiduciary responsibility to shareholders still a live one. To give weight to interests of other stakeholders, often amorphously , on the premise of social responsibility is de facto is

“taxation without representation” on the residual owners, the shareholders..  

 


- conflicts not just  across various stakeholder interests, but also how much weight to attach to conflicting social goods?   To cite a very live debate for the Phl, the issue of the energy trilemma— energy security, affordability/equity vs environment for a country which needs fossil fuel driven base load plants to address poverty— and which only contributes 0.3 pc to global carbon and  in relative terms much less per capita.



-“market-oriented solutions” include:


*ESG ratings— now an emerging industry w dozens of players , but with differing methodologies and emphasis, but in all cases overweighting E - carbon reduction vs S- social impact.  

 


*other mechanisms like explicit vote in Board of Directors or all shareholders  on policy as suggested by Hart and Zingales.

 

I would be remiss if I do not call out more general questions posed by our organizers on the Great Reset.  Namely:

 

• How must we reset our ways of life and rebuild toward a better normal?

• How can we build new foundations for the world’s economic and social systems?

• How can we steer the market towards fairer outcomes?

• How can we ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability?

  

 


To address these questions, we are most honored to have as our  featuredspeaker, highly acclaimed thinker on the subject, Prof. Luigi Zingales.




Professor Luigi Zingales is Robert C. McCormack Distinguished Service Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance and faculty director of the Stigler Center at Chicago Booth. Zingales' research interests span from corporate governance to financial development, from political economy to the economic effects of culture. He co- developed the Financial Trust Index, designed to monitor the level of trust that Americans have toward their financial system. In addition to his position at Chicago Booth, Zingales is currently a faculty research fellow for the National Bureau of Economic Research, a research fellow for the Center for Economic Policy Research, and a fellow of the European Governance Institute. Zingales also serves on the board of ProMarket and is the co-host of the podcast Capitalisn't.

 

 

Pls help me welcome Prof Zingales with a warm virtual applause.

 

 

At the end of his talk.

 

 

To provide reactions to his talk, we are honored to have two deep thinkers on the subject with familiarity  with the Phl and other EMC’s.  One a practitioner like me, and another an Professor .  

 

 

The first is :

 

 

MR. ANTON PERIQUET

 

Mr. Anton Periquet is Chairman and Managing Director of the Campden Hill Group, an investment holding company that owns interests in publicly listed and private equities. He was until recently chairman of BPI Asset Management and Trust Corporation, the wealth management arm of the Bank of the Philippine Islands, and is currently a director in various publicly listed companies, including Ayala Corporation, the Bank of the Philippine Islands, DMCI Holdings, the Max’s Group, Philippine Seven Corporation, Universal Robina Corporation, and Semirara Mining and Power Corporation.   He is an experienced investor and equities analyst and co-founded Deutsche Regis Partners, Inc.

 

Pls help me welcome him. 

 

At the end of his talk. Our next speaker is :

 

DR. BENITO L. TEEHANKEE

Jose E. Cuisia Professor of Business Ethics Management and Organization Department Ramon V. del Rosario College of Business De La Salle University

Dr. Benito L. Teehankee is the Jose E. Cuisia Professor of Business Ethics at the Management and Organization Department of the Ramon V. del Rosario College of Business, De La Salle University. He is Head of the Business for Human Development Network (BHDN). His research focuses on corporate governance, leadership ethics and institutional change. He conducts governance and management development seminars for various corporations. He serves on the boards of the Philippine Academy of Management (PAoM), Shareholders Association of the Philippines (SharePHIL), and the International Humanistic Management Association (IHMA). He has been awarded as Best Business Columnist for his writing in Managing for Society in the Manila Times by the Catholic Mass Media Awards (CMMA) and Outstanding Educator in Corporate Governance by the Financial Executives of the Philippines (FINEX).

 

Take it away, Prof Ben! 

 

—- 

Now for the open forum.  Pls type out your questions in the chat room or in FB, and they will be relayed to me.

 

Let me start the ball rolling while we wait for questions from the floor by asking the first question. 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment