Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Keynote remark for the FMAP Induction, Feb 18, 2025


Twists and Turns in the Year of the Snake


Introductory remarks


Good afternoon, everyone!


It’s good to see many friendly faces. Though I sometimes see that as a mixed blessing. As Luke said in 4:24 , one cannot be a prophet in one’s own land.


I thought to title my talk “Twists and turns in the year of the snake”. The snake seemed a particularly apt Chinese astrological animal at this time of unprecedented uncertainty, where one can be unsuspectingly bitten, or to mix metaphors, be tempted by forbidden fruit with tragic consequences. (Though as someone reminded me, if Adam and Eve were Chinese, they would have eaten the snake instead! )


For those who have been entertained by my briefings as an economic political analyst, I apologize in advance for my greater reserve. It’s not because I am no longer entitled to publicly air my private views— though that’s a consideration. It’s more that being in government teaches one humility. I quote what Henry Kissinger famously said: the longer I am away from government, the more infallible I become. Or an older one from Galsworthy in the 18th century: The degree of idealism is directly proportional to the distance from the problem.


_________


The Year of the Snake is off to an interesting start. Global markets are grappling with the possible repercussions of the ongoing geopolitical fragmentation. Much has already unfolded in the early goings of 2025, and there are bound to be more twists and turns in the the months ahead. Luckily for us, the Philippine economy remains resilient amid emerging risk on both domestic and global fronts.


My talk will be in several parts. First, I will set the stage, the Philippine economy since the pandemic focusing on inflation and growth. Then zoom in on financial and monetary conditions and actions we have taken to make it more resilient. Finally, I will try to crystal ball the uncertainties that face us this year and beyond: Trump 2.0, potential AI disruption, domestic politics.


Setting the stage: the Philippine economy since the pandemic


I. INFLATION DEVELOPMENTS


The BSP remains committed to its primary focus on 

inflation. We have made significant progress in this 

area, with headline inflation decreasing from a peak of 8.7 percent in January 2023. Measures of underlying inflation have also declined. Furthermore, inflation expectations remain within the target range.


It is tempting to declare victory over inflation, given how our projections continue to indicate within-target inflation through 2026 Nonetheless, we remain cautious.


During the policy meeting this February, estimates indicate aslight uptick in the baseline inflation forecasts. Our baseline forecast for average inflation is now 3.5 percent for both 2025 and 2026.


Incorporating risk factors, inflation could be steady for 2025 but could increase to 3.7 percent for 2026. This is important since monetary policy works with a lag and could mostly affect inflation in 2026.

 

We will continue to monitor the upside risks that may emanate from higher utility charges.




 

II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS


Turning to growth. The broader picture shows that the Philippine economy has emerged from the pandemic and the recent inflation episode in a relatively favorable position. The Development Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC) (where the BSP is a resource institution) sees growth reaching 6-8% in 2025-2026.


I referenced the pandemic primarily as a point of comparison. For context, at the start of the pandemic in 2020, I was the Philippine advisor for GlobalSource, an international network of country analysts providing on-the- ground macroeconomic and political risk assessments. Our outlook then was for GDP to contract by around 7 percent for the full year. Others were saying the economy could contract by around 10 to 15 percent. The actual outturn, as we know, was negative 9.5 percent.Looking back, the country's fundamental strengths provided the government the flexibility it needed to respond to the pandemic, allowing the economy to avoid a direr outcome.


In the post-inflation episode, one of the most salient narratives on growth is that the economy will likely continue to grow at a moderate pace through 2026. Part of the story is due to subdued investments, which was an expected effect that followed a record tightening of monetary policy. As you know, the transmission of monetary policy has long lags [12 to 15 months] so the BSP’s recent shift to an easing cycle has yet to fully support a meaningful increase in investment.


The pandemic has also left a mark on the economy. The country’s annualized real GDP has already recovered above its pre-pandemic level in Q3 2022, However, it remains below its pre-pandemic trend level reflecting the long term scarring effects of the pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, from 2009 to 2019, the country’s GDP was growing robustly at an average of 6.0 percent. Our latest forecasts suggest that the projected level of GDP through to the fourth quarter of 2026 will likely remain significantly lower compared to its pre-pandemic trend.




 

Meanwhile, potential output growth also decelerated as consumer spending slowed last quarter and as manufacturing growth remained sluggish amid subdued global demand due to political tensions and the slow recovery of advanced economies. This, however, was partly tempered by the improvements in labor market conditions as unemployment and underemployment numbers continued to drop during the quarter.


Labor productivity has yet to bounce back to pre- pandemic average levels. Between 2012-2019, the country’s labor productivity grew by an average of about 5.0 percent. However, from 2021-2024, following the pandemic, it has grown by an average of only 0.7 percent. This is despite the continued drop in unemployment and underemployment


Comparison of Labor Productivity and Ave. Real Minimum Wage Growth for Pre- and Post-Pandemic Periods




The government has laid out plans to spur economic growth by, among other things, accelerating infrastructure investments(at 5 to 6 percent of GDP annually), enhancing the ease of doing business, and boosting national competitiveness. The “Build Better More” infrastructure program likewise boosts partnership with private sector stakeholders for key infrastructure projects. The government will also invest heavily on human capital and in projects that align the Philippine workforce with the fast-evolving, tech-driven job market.


The country’s fiscal position remains resilient.Outstanding government debt jumped by 20 percent post-pandemic (from end-2022), resulting in a debt-to-GDP ratio of about 60.7 percent (as of December 2024). This highlights the importance of the fiscal consolidation being pursued by the national government over the medium term, to ensure that debt levels are sustainable.

  

 

The S&P Global seemed to have recognized this position of strength when it raised the country’s sovereign rating from stable to positive in November. Our fiscal authorities will need to ensure steady progress in critical fiscal policy reforms, the plugging of revenue leakages, and improvements in the absorptive capacity of implementing agencies.


As for the potential impact of recent global developments, I believe the Philippine economy has more than enough buffers. Our international reserves (GIR) continue to be a reliable backstop against external shocks. As of end-January 2025, our reserves are equivalent to 7.3 months’ worth of imports of goods and payments of services and primary income; and about 3.6 times the country’s short-term external debt based on residual maturity. Although the current account deficit is expected to widen moderately this year against a backdrop of improving investment and infrastructure spending, it remains financeable, as we continue to see steady structural inflows of foreign exchange via overseas Filipinos' (OF) remittances, business process outsourcing (BPO) revenues, tourist receipts, and strong foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows.


My main worry is related to our export earnings. A narrow goods export base consisting mainly of electronics makes that sector overly sensitive to changes in global electronics demand. Electronics, which comprised about half (49.8 percent) of Philippine exports in 2024, faces a slowdown due to the global inventory correction in the semiconductor industry and a less-competitive product mix that is concentrated largely on legacy products and lower-end components. As global demand shifts towards new electronics for energy transition and artificial intelligence (AI), Philippine semiconductor exports are less aligned with high-demand products.


Turning to another growth area, the BPO sector is being disrupted by the emergence of generative AI,(adding another layer of complexity on top of Trump's protectionist bent). BPO industry insiders seem confident that the Philippines can adapt, move up the value chain and maintain growth at around 6 percent. But at the same time, they admit of skills shortage that could constrain expansion over the medium term. Apart from rising operational costs (e.g., rent, wages, training costs), increasing global competition from other outsourcing countries (such as Malaysia, Poland, and Africa) could also be a headwind to the industry’s high growth trajectory. Nonetheless, growth in the IT-BPM industry will be supported by further AI integration. Moreover, increasing demand for healthcare information management also positions the country as a global leader in healthcare outsourcing.

 

 

III. FINANCIAL AND MONETARY CONDITIONS


During the period of tightening of policy rates, the banking sector has maintained solid performance. This is demonstrated by a continued uptrend in assets, loans, deposits, and earnings, along with reasonable provisions for non-performing loans (NPL). As concerns over inflation abate, the BSP has gradually shifted to a less restrictive stance. Our latest data, as of December 2024, indicates thatthe “pass-through” of the BSP’s cumulative 75-bp reduction in policy rates in 2024 has been generally stronger for short-term bank lending rates and moderate for medium- to long-term lending rates.


In our view, monetary policy transmission will be made more efficient with a shorter lag time on this pass- throughby improving depth and liquidity in the local capital market, starting with the money market.


To this end,capital market development is a crucial priority in the BSP’s medium-term strategic plans. A key objective is to develop alternative sources of funding to corporates, and even to smaller businesses that may lack collateral. If there are alternative funding sources, then thecredit risk largely carried by the banking sector will be diversified,ultimately enhancingfinancial stability. A deep capital market can also fund businesses with higher risk profiles that the banking sector might not traditionally  serve. In this way, capital markets can also boost innovation.


This is where improving the benchmark yield curve plays a crucial part in strengthening overall price discovery primarily in the money market and in other segments. As you know, on 18 November 2024, the Bankers Association of the Philippines (BAP) launched an enhanced Peso interest rate swap (IRS) product based on the BSP’s variable overnight reverse repurchase rate. A revitalized PHP IRS market is expected to support thecreationof an interest rate “swap curve” that could serve as a reference benchmark for pricing corporate bonds, mortgages, and bank loans.


The BSP is also working with the BAP to expand the GS repo market. The goal is to transform transactions in the BSP’s RRP and OLF facilities into “real” repos, with the adoption of the Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA) and the actual delivery of collateral government  securities. By enabling the transfer of legal ownership of securities as collateral, banks can use the securities for trading with each other or to meet regulatory requirements. This, in turn, could support pricing and facilitate more trading of securities in the secondary market. In addition to deepening liquidity and facilitating bond price discovery, this will help develop hedging tools for better risk management and attract local and foreign investors  to the Philippine government securities market by reducing credit risks and financing costs.


Future adjustments in the reserve requirement ratios (RRRs) will also ultimately enhance monetary policy transmission. As we gradually dial back monetary policy restriction, we see that further reductions in the RRR will appropriately support our continuing shift towards more market-based monetary operations.


We also want to minimize financial system distortions in the form of high intermediation costs and transaction fees, so that banks can more efficiently channel their funds towards productive loans and investments. To this end, bringing the Philippines’ reserve requirement ratio (RRR) in line with its peers in the region continues to be a long-run goal.


[AMLA Greylist] In 2021, the Philippines made a high-level political commitment to work with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to strengthen the effectiveness of its anti- money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime. At its October 2024 plenary, the FATF initially determined that the Philippines has substantially completed its action plan, warranting an on- site assessment to verify that the implementation of AML/CFT reforms has begun and is being sustained.

 

The Philippines has addressed the 18 action plan items that have kept the country in the greylist. The FATF’s Asia/Pacific Joint Group (APJG) visited the Philippines in January to confirm this assessment and verify the sustainability of the AML/CTF reforms. The removal of the Philippines from the greylist could potentially improve the credit rating and expand foreign investments.


IV. DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY (Impact of Trump policies on the Philippine Economy and other domestic concerns)

Policymakers must navigate uncertainty, remaining nimble to evolving economic conditions. The landscape of external risks arising from policy uncertainty, particularly from Trump 2.0, calls for increased vigilance against potential supply shocks and a global growth slowdown. If these early weeks of the year are any indication, we may need to brace ourselves for more twists and turns this 2025. Perhaps the big question on everyone’s minds at the moment is just how far this looming trade war could go and how much of a blow this could be to the global economy.


To recall,during the first Trump administration (2017- 2020),the US-China trade conflict led to tariffs on over US$500 billion worth of goods in both economies. Between September 2018 and December 2019, —before the Phase One deal was announced—ASEAN+3 exports contracted significantly after previously growing at an average rate of 10 percent.


The Philippines was largely insulated from these trade tensions due to its low participation in global trade and value chains. Despite close trade ties with the US, the Philippines also did not benefit much from the US-China tariffs, unlike Vietnam and Mexico.


In 2023, the Philippines’ trade surplus with the US was at US$3.1 billion (equivalent to 0.7 percent of GDP), and US$3.2 billion in the first ten months of 2024. This small surplus makes it less likely to face targeted US tariff.


However, the anticipated higher tariffs in other countries, particularly China, could impact Philippine trade, by fragmenting global supply chains. This highlights the need for the Philippines to strengthen trade relations with the US through a bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and other sectoral agreements.


The country’s IT-BPM industry, with 70 percent of its market in North America (predominantly the US), faces challenges under a potential Trump 2.0 administration. There is reason to be concerned: during Trump’s previous term, growth in Philippine BPO earningsslowedsharply to 2.5 percent in 2017 and 3.9 percent in 2018, from 12.3 percent in 2016. US firms offshore have also indicated their plans to move operations closer to the US, either through reshoring or relocating to politically stable or geographically convenient countries.


Nevertheless, the possible decline in US outsourcing demand may be partially offset by the industry’s expansion in Europe and Asia Pacific, each of which accounts for about 15 percent of the country’s total IT-BPM market as of 2023.


On the local front, we only need to open the front pages of the newspapers to appreciate the looming risks that may impact the economy not just this year but beyond. Though 2025 is only on senatorial and local elections, it is shaping up to be an existential contest among the protagonists, with profound consequences on our country’s medium term domestic and foreign policy (including on super power conflict) and our future.

 

 

V. CLOSING STATEMENT: PATH FOR MONETARY POLICY


I will conclude by explaining the rationale for our recent decision. While the latest forecasts point to within-target inflation, evolving risks to the outlook for inflation and growth as well as elevated policy uncertainty over the external environment warranted a pause in monetary policy easing at this juncture.


The BSP continues to be attentive to the risks to our inflation outlook, and we continue to support the government’s direct initiatives to address supply constraints and improve agricultural productivity to help mitigate price pressures over the long run.


To reiterate, the BSP will maintain its measured approach to monetary policy easing settings, as it continues to observe the impact of prior monetary policy adjustments on the economy). The BSP will remain data-dependent in deciding on the pace and timing of further reductions in the policy rate. With all these challenges on the horizon, the BSP is geared towards ensuring that the country remains resilient across a wide front. As always, the BSP’s policies and initiatives are centered on delivering on its mandates.


In closing, while the Philippine economy continues to face many challenges, its fundamental strength and resilience remain clear. We are on the brink of new opportunities,and the BSP, along with the country’s economic managers, will continue to push for the progress that we want to achieve.


The good news? The last mile of our battle against inflation has turned in our favor. But it remains to be seen how the current geoeconomic shifts will impact us. Whether it leads to the best or worst of times, no one knows at this point. If Dickens were around today, he might sum it up like this:


"It was the best of times, the worst of times; a season of innovation and disillusionment; an age of connection, yet division; a moment of climate urgency, trumped by escalating chaos; AI at our fingertips, but truth fading; unity promised, but discord reigning; progress made, hope sought, but uncertainty looms.”


And this, as we know, is the landscape of risk and opportunities that the market will navigate in the year ahead.


Maraming salamat po!


Sunday, February 16, 2025

Keynote Remark by Romeo Bermardo for the ICD induction event, Feb 14.


Chairman Emeritus Dr Jess Estanislao, Chair Atty Dick du Balabad, President Bing Matoto, Vice Chair Ida Tiongson, ICD Trustees, Special guests Ms Cora de la Paz-Bernardo, George Barcelon, , dear friends. Good morning.

 

I am most honored to be invited, and truly delighted to be among friends, including former bosses and colleagues, fellow advocates of good corporate governance.

When President Bing invited me a couple of weeks ago to give the keynote address, I hesitated. Why? Several reasons:

First, what can I possibly say that would be of any value to the gurus of corporate governance in this room, starting with your most eminent founder – my boss and mentor – the venerable Dr Jess, The Father of Corporate Governance in the Philippines

 

Second, the idea of speaking before you, former colleagues and current friends, reminded me of Luke 4:24, that one cannot be a prophet in his own land.

But, in the end, Bing is an old friend, who I cannot say no to. More importantly, I trust that friends like you all are forgiving – so here I am, caveats issued, and expectations slightly lowered.

As agreed with Bing, today I will share my outlook on the Philippine economy a topic that aligns with my present responsibilities. I chose the title “Twists and Turns in the Year of the Snake”. The snake seemed to be the apt Chinese astrological animal at this time of unprecedented uncertainty, where we can be unsuspectingly fatally bitten, or, to mix metaphors, be tempted by forbidden fruit with tragic consequences. (Although, as the old joke goes, if Adam and Eve were Chinese, they would have eaten the snake instead!).

 

On a more serious note, I must also ask for your understanding. I cannot be as open as I used to be when I did briefings as private global analyst for GlobalSource Partners.

 

* * *

My talk will be in three parts. First a situationer on the Philippine economy, how it is doing, what are the sources of strength. Second, what are the uncertainties and risks that we need to keep an eye on. Finally, what is the role of corporate governance in ensuring that our companies are resilient, agile and nimble, fast strong and tough, in the face of these threats and challenges.

The Year of the Snake is off to an interesting start. Global markets are grappling with the possible repercussions of the ongoing geopolitical fragmentation. Much has already unfolded this early in 2025, and there are bound to be more twists and turns in the months ahead.

 

In this environment, the Monetary Board decided yesterday to keep policy rates steady. This followed three consecutive rate cuts beginning August last year that reduced the key overnight

RRP rate from 6.50% to 5.75%. The cuts reflect the country’s progress in lowering inflation. Headline inflation decreased from a peak of 8.7% in January 2023 to 2.9% in January this year. Measures of underlying inflation have declined and our projections indicate within- target average inflation through 2026. Inflation expectations also remain within target.


Nonetheless, as I mentioned earlier, elevated policy uncertainty over the external environment warranted a pause in monetary policy easing at this juncture. The BSP is attentive to the risks to our inflation outlook, which are broadly balanced until 2026, and it remains to be seen how the current geoeconomic shifts will impact us.

 

Let me be clear that the BSP looks to continue its measured shift toward less restrictive monetary policy settings but it will remain data-dependent in deciding on the pace and timing of further reductions in the policy rate.

 

Although our primary focus is inflation, in calibrating the monetary stance, we also take into account the impact on the real and financial sectors to ensure that the country remains resilient on a wide front.

 

After a brief post-pandemic spike, economic growth has slowed to an average of 5.6% in the last two years compared with the 6 to 7% growth clip pre-pandemic. Nevertheless, we expect GDP growth to breach 6% this year and next. Disinflation and a less restrictive monetary policy stance, including the impact of prior monetary policy adjustments on the economy, form part of the growth story. The main part of our growth story will continue to be driven by OFW remittances, BPO revenues and government’s infrastructure program, which has been kept at 5- 6% of GDP. The growth story will be supported further by government’s commitment to fiscal consolidation, credible monetary policy, and healthy international reserves that serve as a reliable backstop against external shocks. Note also that our sovereign rating has a good chance of getting an upgrade based on S&P’s positive outlook on the credit.

 

These positive macro developments will also contribute to financial sector stability. The banking sector has maintained solid performance, demonstrated by a continued uptrend in assets, loans, deposits, and earnings, along with reasonable provisions for non-performing loans (NPL). As we gradually dial back monetary policy restrictions, we see that further reductions in the reserve requirement ratio will appropriately support our continuing shift towards more market-based monetary operations. We want to minimize financial system distortions in the form of high intermediation costs and transaction fees so that banks can more efficiently channel their funds towards productive loans and investments. Future adjustments in reserve requirement ratio to bring the Philippine’s reserve requirement ratio in line with its peers in the region will ultimately enhance monetary policy transmission.

I hope I have not made it sound like that all is well with the economy. As we all know, the pandemic has left a mark on the economy with outputs in some sectors, notably real estate and


some manufacturing industries, still below their pre-pandemic levels. Investments as a share of GDP are lower than pre-pandemic despite higher public construction under government’s Build Better More infrastructure program. This has contributed to weaker labor productivity and lower potential economic growth rate. Public debt as a share of GDP is 20 percentage points higher than pre-pandemic, highlighting the need to rebuild fiscal buffers. Poorer education outcomes as well as skills shortage are also very much part of our pandemic scars and present medium-term challenges to growth, including in the IT-BPM industry.

 

 

We also emerged from the pandemic having to face unprecedented geopolitical turmoil. The Russia-Ukraine war, the war in Gaza, and now Trump in the White House. The landscape of external risks arising from policy uncertainty, particularly from Trump 2.0, calls for increased vigilance against potential supply shocks and a global growth slowdown. Perhaps the big question on everyone’s minds at the moment is just how far this trade war could go and how much of a blow this could be to the global economy and the Philippines. Yesterday, our economic research group showed us indices of trade uncertainty and policy uncertainty, both of which spiked, graphically a vertical line up.

 

Although nobody really knows at this point how far the trade war will go, I think we can learn from the experience during the first Trump administration when the US-China trade conflict led to tariffs on over US$500 billion worth of goods in both economies.

 

  First, between September 2018 and December 2019, total exports from the ASEAN+3 region contracted significantly in value, after growing previously at an average rate of 10 percent. The Philippines was largely insulated from trade tensions during this time, reflecting its low participation in global trade and value chains. Today, the Philippines’ trade surplus with the US is relatively small, which makes it less likely to face targeted US tariffs.

  Second, despite the Philippine’s close trade ties with the US, the country did not benefit much from the resulting relocation of firms’ production bases unlike for example, Vietnam and Mexico. The fear this time is that the anticipated higher tariffs on other countries, particularly China, could lead to inefficient fragmentation of global supply chains and further dampen global trade flows. With the Philippine’s friendlier ties with the US under the current administration, will it be able to strengthen trade relations with the US through a bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and other sectoral agreements?

  Third is on trade in services. 70 percent of the market of the country’s IT-BPM industry is in North America (predominantly the US). Under Trump’s previous term, growth in Philippine BPO earnings slowed sharply to 2.5 percent in 2017 and 3.9 percent in 2018, from 12.3 percent in 2016. Given Trump's protectionist bent, there appears to be plans by US firms offshore to move operations closer to the US, either through reshoring or relocating to politically stable or geographically convenient countries. This adds another layer of complication to an industry that is being disrupted by the emergence of generative artificial intelligence. I have talked with industry insiders who seem fairly confident of sustaining growth in line with the overall economy. Their optimism that the Philippines can adapt hinges on moving up the value chain

with further AI integration supporting growth and catering to increasing demand in healthcare outsourcing. Expanding markets in Europe and Asia Pacific would also help in partially offsetting the possible decline in US outsourcing demand.


On the local front, we only need to open the front pages of the newspapers to appreciate the looming risks that may impact the economy not just this year but beyond. Though 2025 is only on senatorial and local elections, it is shaping up to be an existential contest among the protagonists, with profound consequences on our country’s medium term domestic and foreign policy (including on big power conflict) and our future.

 

Now to the subject close to our hearts as fellow advocates of good corporate governance. At the risk of bringing coal to Newcastle, let me share some of my thoughts on the role of the board and good corporate governance in the face of such heightened VUCA (volatility, uncertainty complexity and ambiguity) the likes of which we have not seen since the concept was introduced in the US Army War College in 1987.


I will give some current thoughts and draw from a column I wrote in June 2017 when I was an independent director in a major bank. The column, Corporate Governance in the Digital Age, excerpted remarks I gave to a forum organized by the BSP and IFC on corporate governance for banks. While the landscape has evolved since then, I believe the core principles remain just as relevant today.

 

1)  Board Composition. Governance starts at the top. Good corporate governance is ultimately, the responsibility of the board. As is often rightly said— companies do not fail, boards do. It starts with having the right men and women in the board with rich and diverse backgrounds. Diverse in the terms of gender, age, cultural background, education, professional experience, length of service.

A diverse board is not just about representation. It is a matter of resilience. The more diverse perspectives we have in scanning the horizon, the better prepared we are for what comes next. When leaders from different backgrounds, disciplines, and experiences come together, they collectively bring unique insights that help organizations think through complex risks, challenge assumptions, and seize opportunities. In an age of rapid disruption— from trade policy shifts to AI driven transformation— having a boardroom that mirrors the complexities of the world is not just valuable; it is essential.

 As Darwin famously observed, the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. The same holds true for corporations. Those with diverse, dynamic leadership are the ones that will endure.

 

 Listen to Darwin, ignore Donald.


2)  Culture. Governance is more than compliance. My 2017 column mentioned that in the institution I was with, governance went beyond formal rules. “For us it is all about imbibing and nurturing a culture of integrity, fairness, accountability and transparency cascaded from the Board, its management, and to all our employees”.

I am sure here in the ICD you are making progress towards nurturing such a culture in all the companies you monitor, as well as in your own practices.

 

Culture determines behavior. Without the right governance culture, even the best policies and structures will fall short.

 

We need only look at past crises to see why this matters. Take the Global Financial Crisis – a textbook case of failed governance, where conflicts of interest went unchecked. Credit rating agencies, for example, were paid by the same companies they rated, even advising them on securitization structures that will result in good rating scores. That lack of independence and integrity had catastrophic consequences. The lesson? Strong governance is not just about ticking the boxes, or even following the letter of the rules. It is about embedding the right values.


3)  Risk Management. In that same column, I quoted Governor Tetangco, who said that “risk management is at the heart of corporate governance for banks.” That remains true not just for banks, but for all businesses. Risk today comes in many forms—geopolitical uncertainty, cyber threats, regulatory shifts, financial market volatility, and even reputational risks amplified by social media. Given the unprecedented risks all around, we all need to upgrade our risks management systems commensurate to the heightened threats.

 

We are all navigating an era of economic shifts, geopolitical tensions, and rapid technological advancements. Businesses that embrace good corporate governance—not just as a compliance exercise, but as a strategic imperative— will be the ones that remain resilient, adaptable and competitive. Good governance is not just about rules and regulations; it is about building organizations that can anticipate and respond effectively to change. It is about ensuring that decision-making is informed, transparent, and accountable.

 

As corporate leaders, policymakers, and advocates of good governance, we have a responsibility to uphold these principles. The choices we make today—who we bring to the table, how we structure our decision-making, and how we anticipate risks—will determine our ability to navigate the twists and turns ahead. I highly commend and congratulate ICD, its Founder, leaders past and present for being at the forefront of corporate governance reforms for the past two decades!


The Year of the Snake will surely bring its share of surprises. But with strong governance, diverse leadership, and a steadfast commitment to resilience, we can ensure that Philippine businesses remain agile, competitive, and ready for the future—no matter what it holds.

 

Thank you.







____________________________________________


1 In December 2024, the BSP’s baseline forecast for full-year average inflation in 2025 stood at 3.3 percent while the risk-adjusted forecast was at 3.4 percent. For 2026, the baseline forecast remained at 3.5 percent, while the risk-adjusted inflation forecast remained at 3.7 percent.

1 The unemployment rate stood at 3.1 percent in December 2024, unchanged from last year. The full-year figure settled at 3.8 percent, lower than the 10-year average of 4.8 percent.

1 The underemployment rate in December 2024 was 10.9 percent, lower than the 11.9 percent recorded a year ago and the 10-year average rate of 14.4 percent.

1 For 2025, the CA deficit is seen to widen to US$12.1 billion (2.4 percent of GDP), as the growth forecast for goods exports was lowered relative to the previous forecast alongside an upward revision of services imports growth forecast due to the resurgence in outbound tourism. Meanwhile, the projected steady growth of OF remittances at

3.0 percent continue to lend support to the current account outlook over the near term.

1 Based on the latest IT and Business Process Association of the Philippines (IBPAP) published in October 2024, 67 percent of IT-BPM firms have incorporated AI in their operations, of which 11 percent is in the production stage and 56 percent is in the pilot phase.

1 Source: Oxford Economics

1 IMF Philippines Country Report No. 20/37. (2020). “Export Performance in the context of Global Trade Tensions”. February 2020.

1 Oxford Economics (OE) sees that the economies most at risk from the new US tariffs are likely to be those with substantial trade surpluses with the US, and those that impose higher tariffs than what the US does. Countries at risk are China (US$300 billion trade balance with the US), EU (US$220 billion), Mexico (US$157 billion), and Canada (US$78 billion), which can be further expanded to countries in Asia such as Vietnam (US$109 billion), Japan (US$75 billion), and South Korea (US$55 billion). [Sources: International Trade Center’ Trademap for the trade balance data; OE Research Briefing (Global). “Growth forecasts trimmed on review of Trump 2.0 impact”. 20 November 2024.]

1 OE Country Economic Forecast: Philippines. “Effects of Trump’s win will be limited in the near term.” 20 December 2024.

1 ESM and AMRO. (2024, October) Geoeconomic fragmentation: implications for the euro area and ASEAN+3 regions, (Discussion Paper Series No. 23, Available: https://amro-asia.org/wp- content/uploads/2024/10/DP_No23_Geoeconomic_fragmentation_2024.pdf

1Source:https://www.bsp.gov.ph/SitePages/MediaAndResearch/MediaDisp.aspx?ItemId=7149